Seems like a good idea. Too bad they ruined it with unreadable spelling. What's with that? Are they saying that cats can't spell? Of course cats can't spell. But cats can't write either. Or speak English. So if they're going to pretend that cats can write a Bible, there's no excuse for not using conventional spelling so that a normal person can read it!
The main page helps a little bit but it's still not easy to read. Ceiling Cat = God Basement Cat = Satan Happy Cat = Jesus
kats can spell an speek english, dey jus doan do it when peeps r round. TEH NORMAL PEEPS BIBLE HAS SUM WEIRD ENGLISH 2.
It's not the symbolism I object to. It's the difficulty trying to figure out what it's saying! No they don't. They just say "Meow." Or sometimes "Rarwrer." Or, very rarely, "Wackawackawacka," when nobody is listening. The King James version was written between 1604 and 1611. So it has a lot of archaic English. But it was correct grammar, spelling, and usage at the time it was made. That's very different from a bunch of sillies with too much time on their hands, insulting cats with the untrue and unfounded assertion that cats are uneducated. My cat, if he had been able to write, would have written correctly!
No self-respecting cat would read any version of the Bible other than the original Hebrew O.T. and Greek N.T., or if he HAD to read it to an English-speaker, then the King James. And when it comes to cats, I'm an authority. Remember, it was Daniel (my namesake!) who the kitties didn't bite. You try getting tossed into a lion's den, and see what the kitties think of your disrespect for their education! So there! :rockon:
