Wanted to mention this: Josefino C. Comiso and Dorothy K. Hall Climate trends in the Arctic as observed from space WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:389–409. doi: 10.1002/wcc.277 This journal publishes useful and accessible reviews. Publisher Wiley hopes to be paid though, so off to the library with you.
If a WIRES review is not really what you're after, how about this? Race - Sailing The Arctic Race Anybody who explains what are "high performance volcanic-fiber offshore yachts" gets an automatic 'like'.
Basalt fiber? That had completely escaped my attention, until this thread, despite living atop it a good portion of my life.
Beautiful charts associated with the above research: http://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/sed/content/uploadFiles/scihi_hydrobio_ppt/2014_1_highlights.pdf Abstract: The surface temperature in the Arctic increased at a rate that is 3.5 times larger than that of global temperature from 1981 to 2012. The amplified warming is manifested in many cryospheric parameters. Among the most visible is the 13.5% per decade decline in the extent of the multiyear ice cover since 1979 and the 2.1% per decade retreat of the snow cover since 1967. Moreover, the temperature of the active layer of permafrost has increased while glaciers worldwide and the Greenland ice sheet have been losing mass at the rate of 275 and 228 Giga-tons per year, respectively, in recent years. These results suggest that profound changes in the ecology, environment and climate of the Arctic are imminent. Bob Wilson
New bookmark: CryoSat Operational Monitoring - Overview Switching from area to volume is easy for me. Today's satellites are so much better than what we had before. I was a little surprised that melt water remains a problem. Just another puzzle to work out. Bob Wilson
We had several weeks of warm weather in the Huntsville and the SE in early June when Tropical Storm "Bob" ran a loop around us. I understand Europe is suffering a heat wave too: Historic Heat Scorches Europe - International Weather Blog Weather Blog There appears to be a pattern: Miiddle latitudes get hot and Arctic melting slows Middle latitudes get cool and Arctic melting accelerates I'm getting the impression that monitoring the cool/heat of the middle latitudes gives a good indication of whether the Arctic is going to suffer greater/lessor melting. In effect, as the polar cold air travels south, it is replaced by warmer southern air masses that reduce freezing in the winter or accelerate melting in the summer. Another source: Bob Wilson
just fyi, an interactive chart. Looks like we are around 2005 levels in the artic, which is above 2010 and 2012 for this time of year but less than average. Charctic Interactive Sea Ice Graph | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis For albedo we should look at artic + antartic ice. Antartic hit a record in the last cold season since satelite records were kept. Here is nasa showing artic + antartic. Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum | NASA
Think carbon fiber, but these use crushed basalt, which is cheaper than typical carbon fiber. basalt is created when lava cools, so they call it volcanic as a marketing term.
I was looking at the data last night because I noticed one of the NSIDC charts had not been updated since June 1. Thanks to a clue from 'liar liar' mojo, I found the Danes had kept theirs current: Sure enough, the less rapid rate of melting coincided with a slug of warm air over Huntsville and CONUS when tropical storm 'Bob' did the big loop through Texas, Oklahoma and then points East. I was looking because I knew Alaska has been in some fairly high temperatures. The reason has to do with the northern coast of Alaska: A sliver of clear water on the coast was evident but something else. What caught my eye was the dark, cob-web, ice areas . . . the signature of decompressed ice. Solid ice does not have that cob-web, blackish areas. It looks like in another week or so, the Arctic navigation routes will open. Only the northwest passage appears to have solid, compressed ice. Regardless, the Danish surface chart shows 2015 is in the same general area as 2014 and 2013. Albedo only counts if the sun is shinning on the surface. Today, the Arctic has nearly 20+ hours of daylight. In contrast, Antarctica is in pretty much darkness, nearly 24 hours. There are some other curious things about Antarctica and the earth's orbit. Stuff I'm looking at for sea level changes. Bob Wilson
yep, that interactive chart I showed had artic and antartic. 6 months from now its dark in the artic but bright in the antartic. Not important for sea extent, but grace is measuring loss of antartic thickness. Melting is not from warmer surface temperatures by warmer currents under the ice.
Isn't GRACE measuring only the mass of ice resting on solid ground? I thought the warm current melting was only under floating ice, where the buoyancy of floating objects means there is no mass difference for GRACE to measure. Floating ice thickness must be measured by other means, instruments on other satellites.
errors get greater but it is my understanding that scientist are using GRACE to estimate ice loss in the West antartic ice sheet (WAIS) and East antartic ice sheet (EAIS) Here is a paper talking about errors. Revisiting GRACE Antarctic ice mass trends and accelerations considering autocorrelation
This one does mention 'offshore ice', but does that mean floating ice, or ice that is thick enough to reach, and be supported by, the seafloor? From previous discussions, I had taken WAIS and EAIS to mean non-floating ice. The wikipedia page on WAIS currently says "The WAIS is classified as a marine-based ice sheet, meaning that its bed lies well below sea level and its edges flow into floating ice shelves."
Yes I was talking about ice shelves for ice extent not free sea ice. Part of these ice shelves float. I didn't think that they were counting free floating sea ice for arctic or antarctic ice extent but I could be wrong.
My reading indicates ice flows into the ocean remains a significant part of the mass loss. The glaciers are flowing into the seas faster in part because the undercutting, warm water lubricates their motion. The ice shelfs are restraining but not blocking the flow. Last night I was looking at CRYOSAT-2 that has suspended Arctic measurements until September because melt-water screws up the sounding. But I've not found their Antarctic data yet (web page under construction.) But there is a much simpler metric: Sea level as a global thermometer | PriusChat Bob Wilson
As far as GRACE is concerned, my understanding was that the portions of the ice shelves that float and can be undermined by warm sea water, are indistinguishable free sea ice and from open seawater. To be seen by GRACE, the ice column mass must be different, i.e. heavier, than the equivalent open water. This heavier column weight will automatically cause it to be grounded, which in turn should prevent the circulation of warm water underneath.
The ice is less dense (lighter) than the salt water but this difference in density is smaller than land based ice, so estimates have more margin for error. I was tired when I responded last night, of course sea ice is counted in ice extent. Grace is one of those satelites that allows us to measure that too. We also have more information than grace, gathered though. Here is a paper from last year using radar from planes, that talks about one of the theories of why antarctic ice is thinning. Evidence for elevated and spatially variable geothermal flux beneath the West Antarctic Ice Sheet