Russia withholds natural gas from Europe and others

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by Rybold, Jan 3, 2009.

  1. Rybold

    Rybold globally warmed member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    2,760
    322
    3
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    THIS IS WHY ENERGY INDEPENDENCE IS IMPERATIVE !!!!!!!!!!!

    Is there anyone on here that is living in one of the countries affected by this?

    "As Russia and Ukraine traded accusations in their bitter dispute over energy prices, four European nations -- Romania, Hungary, Poland and Bulgaria -- all reported some supply drops in natural gas Saturday.Gazprom cut off gas shipments to Ukraine on Thursday. Then Gazprom and Ukraine embarked on dueling charm offensives, both trying to assure western European nations that they were reliable energy partners and the fault lay with their rival.
    The Russian delegation hoped to convince investors in Prague, Paris, Berlin and London that Kiev is to blame for any gas shortages, saying Ukraine is siphoning off natural gas from Russian shipments, as well as refusing to pay $600 million in fines or negotiate a new price contract for 2009.
    Russia supplies Ukraine with natural gas and also sends 80 percent of its gas supplies to Europe through pipelines in Ukraine. The stakes in the dispute are high because Europe relies on Russia for a quarter of its gas needs -- and because heat is crucial in the biting northern European winter."

    Ukraine: Serious gas shortages possible: Financial News - Yahoo! Finance
     
  2. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    The EU will side with Russia, and turn their backs on the Ukraine. There is historical evidence of this. Of course, Russia would *never* do anything bad, right?

    Holodomor 1933

    WRONG

    Even the United States supported this genocide. A reporter at the New York Times, Walter Duranty, wrote lies to disprove the genocide, and for his efforts received a Pulitzer Prize

    Walter Duranty

    You are absolutely correct that energy independence is of vital security concern. Unfortunately, now that the price of oil appears to have collapsed, this idea is the furtherst thing from the Average Amercian's mind
     
  3. bat4255

    bat4255 2017 Prius v #2 and 2008 Gen II #2

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    661
    263
    0
    Location:
    Dodge Co. Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    The way I understand it is, the Ukraine hasn't paid for the gas they already recieved yet, that is why they are being cut off.

    Is Russia supposed to give it away for free?

    Moral of this story (and others), Pay Your damn bills.
     
  4. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    From what I've read, 80% of the natural gas that Gazprom sends to the EU, transits the Ukraine. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, all the former Soviet states had debt issues with Mamma Russia, and the rest of the world

    There has never been a satisfactory agreement between the Ukraine and Russia/Gazprom, regarding what is "fair" for transit costs. At various times, actual payments were sent to Ukraine, at other times, Gazprom instead allocated a certain amount of natural gas as "payment"

    This is a complicated issue. However, Russia most certainly is NOT "giving away" the natural gas. For 2005, Ukraine is reported to have consummed 80 billion cubic metres of natural gas: 20 bcm was the Ukraines own production, 36 purchased from Turkmenistan, 17 bcm from Gazprom as "payment" for the pipelines transiting the Ukraine, and 7 bcm purchased from Gazprom

    The issue hangs on transit reimbursement, and what appears to be Gazprom almost daily changing what it charges for natural gas. The Russians are *not* innocent in this matter, but neither are the Ukrainians
     
  5. Mike Dimmick

    Mike Dimmick Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    963
    249
    0
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    The UK doesn't buy any gas from Russia as far as I'm aware, but I've no doubt that speculators will use this as an excuse to push the price up on the futures market.

    The market data history makes interesting viewing. Go to this reports page and select Indices, then UK Natural Gas under Report. The September shock was down to, or at least attributed to, an announcement about a leaky pipeline in Norway. According to this press release, the field that the pipeline serves produces 22.5 million cubic metres of gas per day. The CIA World Factbook states that Norway produces 92.6 billion cubic metres per year, which is around 253 million per day, so this field supplied 8.8% of Norway's production. What we don't know is whether more could be extracted from other fields to cover this loss of production.

    There is no real reason for the price of gas to have been higher in 2008 than in 2007. The last winter increases were also supposedly due to Russian unrest.
     
  6. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    The EU needs to install more Solar thermal water heating and follow Norway's model of heating buildings with sewer water. I know that biogas is rapidly gaining attention there as a hedge against Russian NG, but it probably won't be enough without even more investment in alternatives and efficiency tech.
     
  7. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    How about not living where it's freezing.
     
  8. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Then you'll just need the NG to run AC units.
     
  9. RobH

    RobH Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    2,369
    985
    70
    Location:
    Sunnyvale, California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
  10. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Doesn't matter where you live, even a frozen-cold place like mine (-34 C this morning), there is always opportunity to dramatically reduce energy consumption

    For some reason, the knuckle-dragging crowd seems to think this is "gay," or "tree hugging," or whatever

    No, it's strictly a matter of tactical and strategic importance to not be dependant on another country to meet your energy - or your spending habit - needs
     
  11. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    I've never understood that. I think more and more folks are coming around to the national security POV on this. It's so bloody obvious and it's easier to grasp than the environmental angle (I think it taps into fear more).
     
  12. Rybold

    Rybold globally warmed member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    2,760
    322
    3
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    It's imminent fear that will directly affect those alive today. With global warming, someone will argue that "it won't affect humans for a thousand years," but with "national security," it's tangible, imminent fear.

    Brilliant Idea!!! akin to geothermal heating.


    FYI: Russia resumed natural gas shipments to Europe this morning. :)
    But we must not forget this - this was a warning to everyone of how vulnerable a nation can be when it is ENERGY dependent upon outside nations.
     
  13. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    genius idea.

    are you suggesting we abandon the northern US and resettle below the mason dixon line?
     
  14. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    this is an opening shot by putin.

    i hope obama is up for this one,,,, as someone said the EU will be all for putin reannexing the ukraine,,, will obama go along and allow it?

    i would fast track them into NATO and georgia too.

    putin coming out of retirement scares me.... and the fact he is going up against a rookie is double frightening.
     
  15. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Russia's flexing their muscles because they're scared. The complete collapse of energy commodities prices have put them and their fellow petro-dictators in a bind. Russia has nothing going for it but commodities exports. A poor Russia is a humble Russia. That is precisely why we need to make NG and oil obsolete. The higher the price of oil/gas the less freedom there is in the world.
     
  16. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Seems I recall Russia promising the EU that the dispute with the Ukraine would *not* impact NG shipments to the EU.

    Yeah, right

    I agree that the EU and NATO has to allow Georgia and the Ukraine. Unfortunately, I personally believe that the EU member countries will allow Georgia and Ukraine to become sacrificial lambs to ensure "stable" NG supplies

    I rather doubt anybody will care if Russian tanks roar through Georgia and Ukraine over issues like this. Oh wait, that already happened in Georgia, didn't it?
     
  17. Rybold

    Rybold globally warmed member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    2,760
    322
    3
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Bingo.

    Exactly. And, Obama knows this. "each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet." Text of President Barack Obama's inaugural address - Yahoo! News
    I don't see Russia's cutting NG to Euro as flexing their muscles though. I see it as a desperate attempt to try and influence global NG prices. When oil was at $147, Russian began to go on a power trip. Once oil fell, Russia was silenced. The NG stunt was an attempt to try and influence the market prices of energy. It didn't work. Instead, it gave Euro members the idea to discuss and explore alternative suppliers. The reason that Russia turned the NG back on was because Russia's stunt wasn't working, and they were losing financial income and NEEDED to turn it back on.

    Over the next twelve months (since 100% of Americans will not be driving electric cars before the end of 2009), the longer oil prices can remain low, the weaker Russia will get, and the less strong their military might will be (America will know that Russia is bluffing), and the easier it will be to defend NATO members.
    Additionally, since oil has fallen, Iran has become stuck with a massive debt to Russia. Russia sent Iran tens of billions of dollars worth of building materials and nuclear power plant equipment and now Iran can't repay the debt. Russia remains friendly to Iran (they are natural friends since they are both opponents to NATO), but the financial debt is harming both nations. Russia has loaned money that is not being paid back (money that Russia could have used for itself; it weakens Russia), and Iran has no excess income but accruing debt interest.
    The longer oil remains low, the weaker Russia's and Iran's militaries will get. Have you noticed the decrease in violence in Iraq recently? It's because Iran no longer has massive excess income to fund the insurgents.
     
  18. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    i will personally disagree. russia is not scared. and there is nothing worse than backing a bear into a corner - even a financial one. we should never underestimate our advesary(s).

    putin is a genius. he has tons of experience - and experience where it counts. it is i believe an illusion to think that russia/putin will be hamstringed by money - they have a pretty insulated system in place if it comes down to that. you should also consider the natural animosity that exists between the ukraine and russia,,, like the one that exists between russia and georgia.

    prices of oil and gas do not matter,,, the only thing that matters ultimately,,, who has it and who controlls their transportation and delivery. this downturn in demand is temporary.... the control of it is permanent.

    what better way to fix a recession than to start a war,,, and at the same time satisfy nationalistic desires,,, and at the same time increase your control over natural resources like gas and oil????

    putin is going to play this card,,, no doubt about it,,,, his turning off of the gas was a warning shot aimed directly at the EU ---- message ---- do not interfere with what i am about to do,,,, if you do,,,, make sure you can replace your requirements for gas and oil from somewhere else.

    this will be one of the first real tests of obama and what he does,,,, a HUGE test... does he support freedom for all and defend the ukraine -- in spite of NO aid or assistance in any form from the EU or does he cave. it will set the parameters of future moves by putin, iran, noko, vasquez, etc etc... --- i am not going to touch the economic impacts it will have on us too...

    one of obama's first moves should be to force NATO to fast track the ukraine (and Georgia) in an attempt to block putins next move.
     
  19. Rybold

    Rybold globally warmed member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    2,760
    322
    3
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    dbermanmd,
    you type wise words. thank you.
     
  20. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    But fighting wars costs money... lots of money. All the oil and gas in the world is worthless if nobody's buying. Putin is a petro-dictator. His moves will be predicable because his interests are obvious. Remember, cheap oil, not Reagan brought down the Soviet Union... more specifically, expensive oil, followed by really cheap oil. The lesson is obvious... make oil and gas permanently cheap by destroying the demand for it. If we really want to convince the energy states of the world to play by our rules then we have to make energy cheap and, more importantly, widely available. That means we need to invest massively in renewable energy technology so that imbalances in the availability of energy are erased. We have a massive interest in making this happen. It's in our own best interest. Not only will we be creating massive new markets, but we'll be empowering people all over the world to take control of their own lives and standard of living in a much more sustainable fashion. That HAS to be the goal. The Putins (i.e petro-dictators, not all dickheads... that's asking too much) of the world will recede into history.