I've generally gotten used to trusting the car to maintain distance and slow down autonomously with DRCC. However today I'm not sure I trust it completely. I had it set at 70mph, with the shortest gap out of the three gap settings. An accident up ahead with police cars, which I could see several cars ahead, and the cars in all four lanes slowed down very abruptly. The Prius only looks at the car in front, and decided to brake so late, that I decided to apply the foot brake myself to come to a stop. I didn't feel like it was going to stop safely without my intervention, which made me afraid. I remember the red brake sign coming up on the dashboard, and the tyres squealing as it attempted to stop. It made me think about human vision by the driver, where we can see way up ahead vs the radar on the car which can only see the car the car in front. A friend in a BMW says they sometimes have experienced this when using radar cruise. Anyone else had similar experience? Posted via the PriusChat mobile app.
What does Toyota say about trusting it completely? Are there any disclaimers that this is just a driver assist feature, that the driver is still responsible for controlling the vehicle? I would be astounded if such disclaimers are absent. Full trust won't come without true autonomous vehicles. Those are still some years away from the consumer market. Don't let your expectations get ahead of technological reality.
It's one reason why I don't use 1 bar on the DRCC. With 2 or 3 bars, the car will start braking sooner because it wants to maintain that distance. Or if I can see that traffic is building up, I will increase the distance to 3 bars with my foot hovering over the brake. Now ideally, if you see it, you should be easing off DRCC anyway and start braking on your own. Like you said, as a human, you can see past the car in front and you can process data and determine if early braking is necessary.
From my UK manual on DRCC, "Before using dynamic radar cruise control with full-speed range Driving safely is the sole responsibility of the driver. Do not rely solely on the system, and drive safely by always paying careful attention to your surroundings. The dynamic radar cruise control with full-speed range provides driving assistance to reduce the driver’s burden. However, there are limitations to the assistance provided. Even when the system is functioning normally, the condition of the preceding vehicle as detected by the system may differ from the condition observed by the driver. Therefore, the driver must always remain alert, assess the danger of each situation and drive safely. Relying on this system or assuming the system ensures safety while driving can lead to an accident, resulting in death or serious injury. ■Cautions regarding the driving assist systems Observe the following precautions, as there are limitations to the assistance provided by the system. Failure to do so may cause an accident resulting in death or serious injury. ●Assisting the driver to measure following distance The dynamic radar cruise control with full-speed range is only intended to help the driver in determining the following distance between the driver’s own vehicle and a designated vehicle traveling ahead. It is not a mechanism that allows careless or inattentive driving, and it is not a system that can assist the driver in low-visibility conditions. It is still necessary for driver to pay close attention to the vehicle’s surroundings. ●Assisting the driver to judge proper following distance The dynamic radar cruise control with full-speed range determines whether the following distance between the driver’s own vehicle and a designated vehicle traveling ahead is appropriate or not. It is not capable of making any other type of judgement. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary for the driver to remain vigilant and to determine whether or not there is a possibility of danger in any given situation. ●Assisting the driver to operate the vehicle The dynamic radar cruise control with full-speed range has no capability to prevent or avoid a collision with a vehicle traveling ahead. Therefore, if there is ever any danger, the driver must take immediate and direct control of the vehicle and act appropriately in order to ensure the safety of all involved." Then, the disclaimers surrounding, Toyota Safety Sense, "Toyota Safety Sense∗ ◆ PCS (Pre-Crash Safety system) ◆ LDA (Lane Departure Alert with steering control)∗ ◆ Automatic High Beam∗ ◆ RSA (Road Sign Assist)∗ ◆ Dynamic radar cruise control with full-speed range∗ ◆ Dynamic radar cruise control∗ The Toyota Safety Sense consists of the following drive assist systems and contributes to a safe and comfortable driving experience: WARNING ■Toyota Safety Sense The Toyota Safety Sense is designed to operate under the assumption that the driver will drive safely, and is designed to help reduce the impact to the occupants and the vehicle in the case of a collision or assist the driver in normal driving conditions. As there is a limit to the degree of recognition accuracy and control performance that this system can provide, do not overly rely on this system. The driver is always responsible for paying attention to the vehicle’s surroundings and driving safely." Thanks for the reminder that it's a driver assist feature. I guess I got lulled into a false sense of security because I was reading about others using it in traffic and my initial experience where it did seem more advanced than it actually is in reality. A reality check as you point out.
That's interesting to hear your usage of the system. I tried 1 bar today simply because with 2 or 3 bars, I found that other cars were pulling into the gap very frequently.
Mmhmm. Instead of relying on the system, we can exploit the system to get the best usage out of it. It's not about just following what the manual says but understanding how the system works and how you can utilize it to your situation/scenarios in the best way possible. Computers only follow a set of parameters. It's up to us to determine how to best use it I rarely use 3 bars when cruising because it does leave quite a bit of space (which is good I suppose) but like you said, on the expressway, people will use that space. I find 2 bars to be a happy medium. However, at urban speeds (say 50km/h-60km/h or slower), I will increase it to 3 bars because that those speeds, 3 bars isn't that large of a gap (recall that the DRCC spacing is dynamic and is dependent on travelling speed) and it means the car will react sooner. This is on the Gen 3. On the Gen 4, because DRCC works down to 0km/h, you can always modulate the gap with your right foot. I find when the DRCC stops behind the vehicle, it leaves a pretty good gap. Once the car comes to a stop, I can fine tune (i.e. close) the gap using the accelerator to inch forward. Once I'm satisfied, I can release the accelerator and the DRCC will stop the car and go into "Waiting" mode.
And thanks for posting Toyota's warnings and guidance. I do believe that very effective and reliable systems are coming, and fairly soon. But in the publicity surrounding the recent Tesla Autopilot fatality, it was very clear that many people are misunderstanding the current state of the technology. The truly autonomous hands-off stuff is still in development as expensive research projects. The government performance standards that consumer products must meet, have not yet been issued. The affordable products for sale today on the new car lot are just a stepping stone towards those autonomous hands-off systems. Drivers cannot yet mentally check out.
Well, with so many electronics and driver 'aids' in new vehicles today, and given that each brand's systems may work differently than another brand's system, maybe car companies/dealers should be offering short courses to 'properly' educate new owners on what the system can do, and what it can't do, and how best to use it in all different scenarios? Just like those test environments that Toyota set up for journalists to try the new Safety Sense features away from public roads. Yes of course, there is a several hundred page online manual available post purchase, but I'm starting to think that the option of a practical course at the dealership would be a useful one.
Good grief, the dealership is the LAST place to expect to get reliable information. If Toyota sponsored such a thing directly and left the dealers out of it - great. I imagine that Toyota agrees and doesn't want dealers exposing them to any more liability than they already do.
To be clear, what I meant was that practical courses would be developed by Toyota themselves, but administered by the dealer.
Just in case you don't already know, the owners manuals are available online in pdf format to anyone, and no purchase is required. I downloaded and read the 800 page manual months before I took delivery. I do agree that a practice course would be helpful, just not sure how practical it would be in simulating all of the scenarios you will see on the road. I just took it slow and cancelled cruise with brake or stalk whenever I felt uncomfortable, and it took a good six weeks and a couple thousand miles before operating drcc in traffic became comfortable. J
Yes of course, you are right the manuals are available to anyone. However, I suspect many owners are not passionate enough to be on PC and I would hazard a guess that they wouldn't bother to read the online manual before purchase. Hence, I stated post purchase as the behaviour of the masses.
I'm sure you're right about that. I would even question whether the masses bother to read the manual post purchase, and from my experience with the 6 - 8 dealerships I visited while looking for my car, I know the dealers are not reading the manual. I can't tell you how many times I corrected them when they said something about the car, or tried to help me find something. None of them even had a very good handle on the options packages. J
ROFL. Yes, at my local Toyota dealer, the sales person insisted the new Prius was not available with 15 inch wheels, despite the model in the showroom that we were staring at, having 15 inch wheels. Needless to say, I didn't buy the car through them.
I use 1 bar while waiting in traffic and 2 or 3 bars when not a lot of cars are on the road and the traffic is clear. Still, I'm unsure/nervous about using the DRCC when approaching stopped traffic. The first time I used DRCC, the brake sign popped up and the car slammed on its brakes. I thought it would be more gradual.
. Yes, I've noticed that. My suspicion is that it first spots a vehicle in front, then assesses it's speed - then reacts, all possibly a bit later than I would have done. I had the distance set to the longest the time I did, but the braking was a bit harder than I would have done, but it did stop with plenty of gap. Next time I saw that scenario coming up, I did it myself, much smoother.
I've heard Toyota's system is better than most other automakers' systems. It's pretty good, but I'm hoping there'll be a software update that fixes the distance sensitivity and how quick it responds. I just want it to respond like how a human drives (noticing the car two cars in front).