You might want to start with an easier topic like correcting all the untruths in michale moore's F9/11.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Jun 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]269901[/snapback]</div> Have you seen the film?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Jun 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]269901[/snapback]</div> ...and the highly unobjective spin. Just like all his other documentaries, you see everything through HIS glasses, PARTICULARLY F9/11... Everytime I see him, I wonder what it would be like to kick his gut. The fat rippling up through his neck would make a great repeating-loop avatar...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(fshagan @ Jun 11 2006, 05:03 PM) [snapback]269715[/snapback]</div> Nope wrong on both accounts he meant "Persecuted" :lol: , BaHaHaHahAHAHAaaa I kill myself. :blink:
Ann is a damn hack! She makes stuff up just to put it in print. If you read her “footnotes†(she calls them that, but they are actually in the back of the book – and therefore not footnotes!) you can usually find an inconsistency or a comment that dilutes the “messageâ€. I haven’t looked at this book to see if she still uses the footnote rationalization, but I’m guessing that once a hack always a hack. Her crap is like Michael Moore’s (though I love how he made “W†look!) and Rush Limbaugh’s – too far to either side to take seriously.
