Thanks to a FOIA request from the Sunshine Project http://www.sunshine-project.org , a fascinating document has now come to light. In June 1994, the US Air Force Wright Laboratory wrote a proposal titled "Harassing, Annoying, and 'Bad Guy' Identifying Chemicals." While listing the categories of chemical weapons they planned to develop, the military scientists wrote: Chemicals that effect [sic] human behavior so that discipline and morale in enemy units is adversely effected [sic]. One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior. The Air Force Lab was quite serious about the proposal, listing a timetable and estimate of expenses for the overall project. Total cost through fiscal year 2000: $7.5 million Having enemy soldiers throw down their guns and start humping each other: Priceless The document is here http://www.sunshine-project.org/incapacita...f/wpafbchem.pdf
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Beryl Octet @ Jan 4 2007, 11:26 AM) [snapback]370721[/snapback]</div> I wonder if they have been secretly testing this on the US citizens?
They need to use it widespread in Iraq - it'll stop the violence, and bring a whole new meaning to the term IED
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(priusguy04 @ Jan 4 2007, 01:36 PM) [snapback]370724[/snapback]</div> Yeah, they air burst it over San Fransisco...
Actually, something better might be a weapon that decreases the testosterone in men, rendering them less violent. We could drop it over the Pentagon. [smile]
And all this time I thought Flesh Gordon was fiction. edit: Anyone else remember that old movie? With Dr. Wang's Sex Ray?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MegansPrius @ Jan 4 2007, 04:09 PM) [snapback]370941[/snapback]</div> They'd just kiss and make up.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Pinto Girl @ Jan 4 2007, 12:25 PM) [snapback]370777[/snapback]</div> For a moment, I thought you were describing the twisted incarnation of the HUMVEE - the civilian H2.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Delta Flyer @ Jan 4 2007, 04:21 PM) [snapback]370952[/snapback]</div> Actually, this would tend to have a more easily quantified...ummmm, shall we say, 'measurable' effect...?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Pinto Girl @ Jan 4 2007, 01:25 PM) [snapback]370777[/snapback]</div> Don't drop it over the Pentagon. I have a date this saturday night. Dan
Lucky Me!! I'm homosexual AND I don't need drugs. How cool is that?? Would these drugs cause me to be heterosexual? What would happen if someone set of a bomb full of this stuff at the Republican National Convention??
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Bob Allen @ Jan 5 2007, 04:40 PM) [snapback]371501[/snapback]</div> A *lot* of closeted homosexuals would finally have the strength to come out!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Bob Allen @ Jan 5 2007, 04:40 PM) [snapback]371501[/snapback]</div> I'm not exactly sure, but I'd love to find out. Maybe Tim Burton could make a movie out of it or something. You know how the alien's brains exploded in Mars Attacks? There could be some scenes like that I'm sure... Anyway, gay, straight, bi, quad, whatever, just more labels, just one more thing to divide us, seems like this would be a non-issue by now, and we'd be worrying about the planet, or what happens when the dinosaur juice runs out, instead of who's doing what to who in the privacy of their own lives or what "sanctifies" a marriage.
