http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17441481/ I love this dichotomy: "The draft report, which is still being completed, projects that the current administration’s climate policy would result in the emission of 9.2 billion tons of greenhouse gases in 2020, a 19 percent increase from 7.7 billion tons in 2000." "The White House Council on Environmental Quality has been coordinating the draft report. A spokeswoman, Kristen Hellmer, said it “will show that the president’s portfolio of actions and his financial commitment to addressing climate change are working. And the president is always looking at ways to address our energy security and environmental needs.â€" Did I mention that the report is overdue by a year?
Is this in spite of the promise Bush made at the last State of the Union address stating that gasoline usage would be reduced by 20% in 10 years? Oh, I see here what's slowing down progress: 'Doing more than slowing the growth rate of greenhouse gas emissions, which remains the administration’s stated goal, will be decided “as the science justifies,” ... ' Who is this IPCC anyway, and what do they know about mankind's contribution to global warming? We all know Exxon is the real expert on climate truthiness.
Can someone please point me to some evidence, hard evidence, that man is indeed effecting the weather and such? I'd really be interested in seeing it, as I haven't actually read any good data. Please, don't point me to some hippy crap or some obviously biased source.. Thanks.
I suppose you consider The E.P.A. to be "hippy crap". Key quote from above link: "Human activities are changing the composition of Earth's atmosphere. Increasing levels of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere since pre-industrial times are well-documented and understood."
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(desynch @ Mar 3 2007, 09:50 PM) [snapback]399786[/snapback]</div> Its the climate, not the weather. (Although there is some evidence out there that we have some impact on the weather as well, for example, in the highly populated East coast, it has been shown that it is more likely to rain on a Saturday than a Wednesday, but I digress....) As for the evidence of man's contribution to climate change... come on. It's a pretty common topic in the news. Pick just about any news source EXCEPT Fox and pay attention for a few days. On second thought... a quick check on foxnews.com reveals that even they are reporting that global warming is anthropogenic: The recent report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has confirmed that human induced global warming is occurring, said Karla Dutton, director of the Alaska program for Defenders of Wildlife. "There's no way around it _ in order to conserve polar bear habitat in the long term, we must act immediately to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, the principal cause of global warming and this Arctic meltdown," she said.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(desynch @ Mar 3 2007, 11:50 PM) [snapback]399786[/snapback]</div> Certainly.... http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf I'm sure once you've completed a full PhD course on meteorology, geology and climatology you'll be as qualified as the world experts to dissect and discuss the statistics and facts of the literature used to arrive at the concensus of these learned men. Or you could listen to a bunch of right wing H2 drivers who just don't wanna belive that the factory belching filth into the sky could actually do anything bad.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Mar 4 2007, 02:24 AM) [snapback]399806[/snapback]</div> I think I'll go with the Scientific community on this one.
http://priuschat.com/GW-takes-a-blow-t30270.html GW is just following a natural course.. I feel its just another way to waste Billions & billions of dollars to study the effects. And God help the Scientists that stand up and go against the flow, as they are concidered nut-cases There are plenty of left wing scientist that agree GW is following natural courses Man just adds 0.25% to the mix so yes its a rather low percentage .... :mellow:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(desynch @ Mar 4 2007, 03:22 AM) [snapback]399830[/snapback]</div> The scientific community is not agreed on this one either. if you believe in tested models than i am assuming you are a believer in supply-side economics and tax cuts too?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(priusguy04 @ Mar 5 2007, 09:02 AM) [snapback]400355[/snapback]</div> Yet again, you need to research. You're getting as bad as Fox News.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Mar 5 2007, 11:05 AM) [snapback]400360[/snapback]</div> While there is not 100% agreement on this the huge (something like 95% of learned experts) are in agreement on 'this one'. I'm sure you are very aware that there are always outliers in any issue and scientific ones are no exception...medicine is a fine example where there are plenty of well done research papers on a subject with one or two (often sponsored by drug companies) that show a different result. We certainly don't stop treating our patients with the therapy that the weight of scientific evidence supports b/c of those one or two outliers. Likewise the global warming issue. The agreement is huge. "Proof" is impossible in something like this, or would, take centuries to do so...and by then irreperable damage would be done, important science and technologic development delayed....To continue the health care metaphor, the patient would die or become extremely ill due to our ignoring the best available evidence and the weight of scientific opinion.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Mar 5 2007, 09:12 AM) [snapback]400366[/snapback]</div> More importantly by ignoring the evidence and the opinions of professionals we not only place our future in jeopardy due to climate change but our continued "business as usual" approach to economics and environmental issues places us directly on the path of collapse that was exposed in so many cultures prior to ours. Learn from history. Rampant growth and destruction of limited natural resources has destroyed nearly every major civilization before ours, what makes us think we are so special and above natures laws? It is time for us to move forward and learn to live in symbiosis with nature for there we will truely prosper in the long term. As biologist Lynn Margulis put it, "Life did not take over the planet by combat, but by networking."
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(F8L @ Mar 5 2007, 12:32 PM) [snapback]400384[/snapback]</div> The Sky is falling, The Sky is falling, The Sky is falling, run run hide your selves park your evil cars shut down the factories until a cure can be found!!!! I believed the weather man on the news that it was going to rain thurs, fri & sat. Guess what it only rained on sat in the afternoon.... What evidence? oh your talking about facts and figures that a flawed person has stated to be true? Man is flawed he makes mistakes. This is a garanteed money maker GW, Scare everyone and they will give Billions to research it.... even though we do our part by adding a mear 0.25% compaired to natures 90% Anyone that opposes GW is wrong Professionals have stated such...... even if those who oppose the facts are also professionals from the same field, they are labled nuts / outcasts..
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(priusguy04 @ Mar 5 2007, 09:48 AM) [snapback]400397[/snapback]</div> Tsk tsk tsk... Thee you are using your frame again. I'm sorry I put more faith into science than you do your bible and political yamerings of the ultra-wealthy who intend to do nothing that will hamper their lifestyle. Again, I suggest you go educate yourself in biology, chemistry, physics, and anthropology and this time, leave one side of your frame off so you can assimilate new information and not immediately reject it based on your current views. There is a reason they call it the precautionary principle. If done right we have nothing to lose and a lot to gain. If ignored we have everything to lose and no more to gain than if we had done it right.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(priusguy04 @ Mar 5 2007, 11:48 AM) [snapback]400397[/snapback]</div> A bit heavy on the drama and a bit light on any substance there. The sky is falling, albeit very slowly, based upon all the facts and information available to us today. While I absolutely agree that man is flawed and that it's entirely possible that 200 years from now we'll be able to look back and giggle at the errors our scientists made it's just as possible that they're right and that there is something we can do to slow global warming and make for a better, cleaner future for our children's children's children. There's simply no downside to reducing the amount of filth we belch into the atmosphere...at the very least the immediate impact would be a reduction of environmentally triggered illnesses such as asthma and cleaner clearer skies over cities like Denver that, to this day, still have "Yellow", "Green", and "Red" days based upon how much smog and haze cover the city...it's a disgusting site to drive into Denver from the mountains and the city is covered by a halo of yellow smog. I wanna repeat this...I'm no tree-hugger. I've never donated money or time to any environmental organization. I've never strapped myself to a redwood. I'm far far from an extremist on environmental issues and I'm a scientist and a skeptic by nature and career. But this issue of global warming is a no-brainer IMO. Change is necessary, we have the ablity and technology to clean up emissions from cars, factories and almost all sectors...the only thing delaying that is cost and pressure from lobbiests to prevent the gov't from forcing those changes.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(desynch @ Mar 4 2007, 01:50 AM) [snapback]399786[/snapback]</div> The best site I've seen is http://www.realclimate.org/ It's run by climate scientists. I think it was Alric on this forum who brought it to my attention.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Mar 4 2007, 01:24 AM) [snapback]399806[/snapback]</div> You mean these individuals?: Dr. Daniel Schrag, Claude Allegre, Dr. Patrick Michaels, Dr. Fred Singer, Professor Bob Carter, the geologists of James Cook University in Australia, Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan,... (Hmm, wonder if they all drive Hummers - do they make a left hand drive for our friends down under?; surely those evil oil companies and fat cat lobbyists are paying them off!!) Who is to question the expert opinions of Tom Cruise, Cameron Diaz, Julia Roberts, Leonardo Dicaprio, many who even have high school degrees. I heard even Al Gore has an advanced degree in journalism. Guess I'll start tithing my paychecks to Carbonfund.org. You should too. Maybe the government will do that for me on my next 1040. Rick #4 2006 Where's the next <strike>Dixie Chicks</strike> "Stop Global Warming" concert?? Can't wait to get my tickets!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(viking31 @ Mar 5 2007, 02:01 PM) [snapback]400412[/snapback]</div> Well, some of those you list certainly do have oil connections -- Lindzen, Michaels, and Singer all have extensive connections with Exxon-funded groups. See pages 34-35 of http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/glo...xxon_report.pdf Alfred P. Sloan has been dead since 1966.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(viking31 @ Mar 5 2007, 10:01 AM) [snapback]400412[/snapback]</div> You can read more about your list of supporters here. Inhofe's Last Stand For what it's worth I read a book called "Snowball Earth" that details Daniel Schrag and Paul Hoffman's hypothesis of SnowBall Earth, of which most geoscientists believe to be false, and found it quite intruiging. In fact, Daniel's work on cap carbonates was what first peaked my interest in climatology (which I still know very little about but chemistry classes as helping lol)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(viking31 @ Mar 5 2007, 01:01 PM) [snapback]400412[/snapback]</div> Please keep writing. Wow--a whole handful of scientists who disagree that GW is a problem! You must be so proud! I can't believe there are people out there who are still arguing this topic. It's ridiculous! Here's just a start of the line-up of the other side...I've got more if you want 'em. And not one of 'em a celebrity... Coordinating Lead Authors Hervé LE TREUT France Historical Overview of Climate Change Science Richard SOMERVILLE USA Historical Overview of Climate Change Science Lead Authors Ulrich CUBASCH Germany Climate processes, Climate modelling, Uncertainties Yihui DING China Climate processes, Climate modelling Cecilie MAURITZEN Norway Climate processes, Climate modelling, Uncertainties Abdalah MOKSSIT Morocco Observations Thomas PETERSON USA Observations Michael PRATHER USA Climate processes, Climate modelling, Uncertainties Review Editors Alphonsus BAEDE The Netherlands Historical Overview of Climate Change Science David GRIGGS United Kingdom Historical Overview of Climate Change Science Maria MARTELO Venezuela Working Group I Vice Chair Chapter 2: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing Coordinating Lead Authors Piers M. de F. FORSTER United Kingdom Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing Venkatachalam RAMASWAMY USA Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing Lead Authors Paulo ARTAXO Brazil Aerosol Forcing, Land-use Forcing Terje BERNTSEN Norway Greenhouse gases, Aircraft Effects, GWPs Richard A. BETTS United Kingdom Land-use Forcing David W. FAHEY USA Greenhouse gases, Aircraft Effects James HAYWOOD United Kingdom Aerosol Forcing Judith LEAN USA Solar and volcanic forcing David C. LOWE New Zealand Greenhouse gases, Gunnar MYHRE Norway Land-use Forcing, Aircraft Effects, GWPs John NGANGA Kenya Aerosol Forcing Ronald PRINN USA Greenhouse gases, GWPs Graciela RAGA Mexico Aerosol Forcing Michael SCHULZ France Aerosol Forcing Rob VAN DORLAND The Netherlands Greenhouse gases, Solar and volcanic forcing Review Editors Teruyuki NAKAJIMA Japan Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing Veerabhadran RAMANATHAN USA Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing Chapter 3: Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change Coordinating Lead Authors Philip JONES United Kingdom Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change Kevin TRENBERTH USA Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change Lead Authors Peter AMBENJE Kenya Surface climate, Tropics and sub-tropics, Extreme events Roxana BOJARIU Romania Atmospheric circulation, Patterns of variability David EASTERLING USA Surface climate, Extreme events Albert KLEIN TANK The Netherlands Surface climate, Tropics and sub-tropics, Extra-tropics David PARKER United Kingdom Surface climate, Free atmosphere, Atmospheric circulation, Patterns of variability, Tropics and sub-tropics, Extra-tropics Fatemeh RAHIMZADEH Iran Surface climate James A. RENWICK New Zealand Surface climate, Atmospheric circulation, Patterns of variability, Tropics and sub-tropics, Extra-tropics Matilde M. RUSTICUCCI Argentina Patterns of variability, Tropics and sub-tropics, Extreme events Brian SODEN USA Surface climate, Free atmosphere Panmao ZHAI China Patterns of variability, Tropics and sub-tropics, Extreme events Review Editors Brian HOSKINS United Kingdom Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change Bubu Pateh JALLOW The Gambia Working Group I Vice Chair Tom KARL USA Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change Chapter 4: Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground Coordinating Lead Authors Peter LEMKE Germany Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground Jiawen REN China Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground Lead Authors Richard ALLEY USA Snow, Sea ice, Glaciers, Ice shelves, Ice sheets, Frozen ground Ian ALLISON Australia Sea ice, Ice shelves, Glaciers Jorge CARRASCO Chile Snow, Sea ice, Ice shelves Gregory FLATO Canada Snow, Sea ice, Ice shelves, Ice sheets, Frozen ground Yoshiyuki FUJI Japan Ice shelves, Ice sheets Georg KASER Austria Glaciers Philip MOTE USA Snow Robert H. THOMAS USA Ice sheets, Ice shelves Tingjun ZHANG USA Snow, Frozen ground Review Editors Roger BARRY USA Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground Toshio KOIKE Japan Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground Chapter 5: Observations: Oceanic Climate Change and Sea Level Coordinating Lead Authors Nathaniel L. BINDOFF Australia Observations: Ocean Climate Change and Sea Level Jurgen WILLEBRAND Germany Observations: Ocean Climate Change and Sea Level Lead Authors Vincenzo ARTALE Italy Ocean physics, Sea level Anny CAZENAVE France Ocean physics, Sea level Jonathan GREGORY United Kingdom Sea level projections Sergey GULEV Russia Ocean physics, Ocean circulation Kimio HANAWA Japan Ocean physics, Ocean circulation Corrine LE QUÉRÉ Germany Biogeochemical tracers Sydney LEVITUS USA Ocean physics, Ocean circulation Yukihiro NOJIRI Japan Biogeochemical tracers C. K. SHUM USA Sea level Lynne D. TALLEY USA Ocean physics, Ocean circulation Alakkat S. UNNIKRISHNAN India Sea level Review Editors Laurent LABEYRIE France Observations: Ocean Climate Change and Sea Level David WRATT New Zealand Working Group I Vice Chair Chapter 6: Paleoclimate Coordinating Lead Authors Eystein JANSEN Norway Paleoclimate Jonathan OVERPECK USA Paleoclimate Lead Authors Keith BRIFFA United Kingdom Paleoclimatic proxies Jean-Claude DUPLESSY France Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations, Abrupt climate change, Modelling Fortunat JOOS Switzerland Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations, Modelling Valérie MASSON-DELMOTTE France Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations, Abrupt climate change, Modelling Daniel OLAGO Kenya Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations Bette OTTO-BLIESNER USA Paleoclimatic observations, Abrupt climate change, Modelling Wm. Richard PELTIER Canada Paleoclimatic observations, Modelling Stefan RAHMSTORF Germany Paleoclimatic observations, Abrupt climate change, Modelling Rengaswamy RAMESH India Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations Dominique RAYNAUD France Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations David RIND USA Paleoclimatic observations, Modelling Olga SOLOMINA Russia Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations Ricardo VILLALBA Argentina Proxies, Paleoclimatic observations De'er ZHANG China Paleoclimatic observations, Modelling Review Editors Jean JOUZEL France Working Group I Vice Chair John MITCHELL United Kingdom Modelling Chapter 7: Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry Coordinating Lead Authors Guy BRASSEUR Germany Coupling Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry Kenneth L. DENMAN Canada Coupling Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry Lead Authors Amnat CHIDTHAISONG Thailand Atmospheric chemistry Philippe CIAIS France Carbon cycle, Land surface Peter COX United Kingdom Carbon cycle, Land surface Robert DICKINSON USA Land surface, Biogeochemical cycles Didier HAUGLUSTAINE France Atmospheric chemistry, Air quality Christoph HEINZE Norway Marine biogeochemical cycles Elisabeth HOLLAND USA Carbon cycle, Atmospheric chemistry, Land surface, Biogeochemical cycles Daniel JACOB USA Atmospheric chemistry, Air quality, Biogeochemical cycles Ulrike LOHMANN Canada Air quality, Aerosol effects, Biogeochemical cycles Srikanthan (S.) RAMACHANDRAN India Air quality, Aerosol effects Pedro Leite da SILVA DIAS Brazil Land surface, Biogeochemical cycles Steven C. WOFSY USA Carbon cycle, Land surface, Biogeochemical cycles Xiaoye ZHANG China Air quality, Aerosol effects Review Editors Kansri BOONPRAGOB Thailand Working Group I Vice Chair Martin HEIMANN Germany Coupling Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry Mario MOLINA USA Coupling Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry Chapter 8: Climate Models and their Evaluation Coordinating Lead Authors David RANDALL USA Climate Models and their Evaluation Richard A. WOOD United Kingdom Climate Models and their Evaluation Lead Authors Sandrine BONY France Current climate, Processes, Climate sensitivity Robert COLMAN Australia Current climate, Processes, Climate sensitivity Thierry FICHEFET Belgium Thresholds and abrupt events, Simple models John FYFE Canada Current climate, Climate variability, Processes, Extremes Vladimir KATTSOV Russia Current climate, Climate variability simulations Andrew PITMAN Australia Current climate simulations, Climate processes Jagadish SHUKLA USA Current climate, Climate variability Jayaraman SRINIVASAN India Current climate, Climate variability, Processes Ron STOUFFER USA Current climate, Climate variability, Processes, Extremes, Climate sensitivity Akimasa SUMI Japan Current climate, Climate variability, Processes, Extremes Karl E. TAYLOR USA Current climate, Climate variability, Extremes, Climate sensitivity Review Editors Elisa MANZINI Italy Climate Models and their Evaluation Taroh MATSUNO Japan Climate Models and their Evaluation Bryant MCAVANEY Australia Climate Models and their Evaluation Chapter 9: Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Coordinating Lead Authors Gabriele HEGERL USA Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Francis ZWIERS Canada Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Lead Authors Pascale BRACONNOT France Pre-industrial climate change Nathan GILLETT Canada Reliability of predictions, Instrumental era climate change Yong LUO China Climate response, Instrumental era climate change Jose Antonio MARENGO Brazil Reliability of predictions, Instrumental era climate change Neville NICHOLLS Australia Reliability of predictions, Instrumental era climate change Joyce PENNER USA Climate response, Instrumental era climate change Peter A. STOTT United Kingdom Climate response, Reliability of predictions, Instrumental era climate change Review Editors David KAROLY USA Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Laban OGALLO Kenya Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Serge PLANTON France Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Chapter 10: Global Climate Projections Coordinating Lead Authors Gerald MEEHL USA Global Climate Projections Thomas STOCKER Switzerland Global Climate Projections Lead Authors William COLLINS USA Future radiative forcing, Timescales of response, Global projections, Model uncertainties Pierre FRIEDLINGSTEIN France Timescales of response, Global projections, Model uncertainties Amadou Thierno GAYE Senegal Timescales of response, Global projections Jonathan GREGORY United Kingdom Global projections, Sea level projections, Model uncertainties Akio KITOH Japan Global projections, Model uncertainties Reto KNUTTI Switzerland Climate change over different time scales, EMICs James MURPHY United Kingdom Global projections, Model uncertainties Akira NODA Japan Global projections, Model uncertainties Sarah RAPER United Kingdom Global projections, Simple models Ian G. WATTERSON Australia Global projections, Model uncertainties Andrew WEAVER Canada Global projections, Sea level projections, Model uncertainties Zong-Ci ZHAO China Global projections, Model uncertainties Review Editors Myles ALLEN United Kingdom Global Climate Projections Govind Ballabh PANT India Global Climate Projections Chapter 11: Regional Climate Projections Coordinating Lead Authors Jens Hesselbjerg CHRISTENSEN Denmark Regional Climate Projections Bruce HEWITSON South Africa Regional Climate Projections Lead Authors Aristita BUSUIOC Romania Downscaling, Regional projections Anthony CHEN Jamaica Small Islands Xuejie GAO China Regional projections Isaac HELD USA Regional projections, Regional model uncertainties Richard JONES United Kingdom Downscaling, Regional projections Rupa Kumar KOLLI India Regional projections Won-Tae KWON R. Korea Regional projections René LAPRISE Canada Regional models, Downscaling, Regional projections Victor MAGAÑA RUEDA Mexico Regional projections, Regional model uncertainties Linda MEARNS USA Regional models, Downscaling, Regional projections, Regional model uncertainties Claudio Guillermo MENENDEZ Argentina Regional models, Regional projections Jouni RÄISÄNEN Finland Regional projections, Regional model uncertainties Annette RINKE Germany Regional models, Regional projections Abdoulaye SARR Senegal Regional projections Penny WHETTON Australia Regional models, Regional projections Review Editors Congbin FU China Regional Climate Projections Filippo GIORGI