Separate names with a comma.
Err..I am copying myself...
For copying blogspots to make scientific arguments, yes. I would love it if people would just show data.
Isn't there an attribution for every graph?
That's all you do.
Ok. Without a link. Explain to me how the comment "hide the decline" undermines the instrumental record observation of contemporary warming....
How so?
What stuff! What is the rebuttal for that explanation? All that deniers do is repeat that there are 11 years of cooling or such without showing...
Didn't I just post an explanation that debunks this logic? Two posts above?
Your explanation is incorrect. As shown above.
I think it is important to report all the different sets of data. With and without tree ring data: The other problem is that you are looking...
Exactly! It is all about one particular set of data using one particular method and all after there is an instrumental record. This was in 2004....
In short. The "hide the decline" comment was about one line in one graph out of the multiple lines in multiple graphs that show unequivocally...
From my favorite blog (and my cathedra field) Pharyngula. Note that I am not making a claim about the science but a comment on the "debate"....
This is a laughable claim.
chogan2 absolutely nails "the other side".
Profit margin is a poor indicator of actual profit. It is a measure of efficiency or return on investment by the company. Look at actual profits...
The middle between correct and incorrect is still incorrect. You are right about the media though. I wouldn't call it brainwashing but it is...
That's right. Who drew this graph? 5 years worth of data with a Y axis that goes from 365 to 375.
It's not ok to make arguments using blogposts as reference. It's ok to share anything for general interest.
I can tell you it will take more that blogposts that reinforce your preconceptions.
