Separate names with a comma.
I hate to even use the word scientists here because when you falsify data (or just delete that which is inconvenient) you no longer become an...
No - I've held that position for a long time (I do drive a Prius for a reason) but still think the global warming issue is blown vastly, vastly,...
Good points about AMO and PDO as well as about the models being a "mess". Yet I do agree it is prudent to reduce CO2 to the point where there is...
You can also see an evaluation of the permafrost media hype here: “Methane levels may see 'runaway' rise, scientists warn - A rapid acceleration...
You are talking 2 degree C rise, I am talking about this study which says 1.3 C rise on land. Regardless, empirical data is not supportive of...
Yeah - I wouldn't really put too much stock in single year metrics in any case...but still stand by my concerns about the surface temperature...
From my understanding, the Menne study does not really get at the affect on the temperature data of long term UHI encroachment. And I agree with...
You are correct - surfacestations is not peer reviewed. You point out a valid issue... We rely on the land-based surface temperature data from...
No - tell me. And it is 1.3 over land. Show me the peer reviewed study that demonstrates the consequences and also one that shows the...
1.6 C with a doubling of CO2 over CURRENT (not pre-industrial) levels? And 0.3 lower on land. Doesn't sound like much a problem to me. But if...
Upward bias noted in a lot of papers - http://pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/r-321.pdf....
In point of fact, there is a lot of sloppy science going on with IPCC etc. I mean come on, sourcing info from the World Wildlife Fund? East...
You are a LIAR. Here is an example of what I have said nearly a year and a half ago in an EPA CO2 Endangerment discussion. "In my view, CO2...
Good info chogan. But it begs the question why did they choose a model "at the low end of the sensitivity"? Would they not choose the model they...
Yeah well not hard to hit a bunch of "highs" when something like 2/3rds of all US weather stations have documented upward bias of 2 degrees C or more.
As I've argued for years, doubled CO2 is no big deal. Looks like a new NASA study confirms this: A group of top NASA boffins says that current...
If that is the standard, then we should discount everything Josh Willis does on ocean temps. Or Michael Mann on temperature reconstructions. Or...
Drought seems more closely related to PDO and AMO cycles than anything... "The relationship between drought in the continental US and the phases...
How does one arrive at a "90% probability" of something happening (as does the IPCC) when there is no basis in fact whatsoever to support that...
The IAC report was hardly inspiring and the E. Anglia report a whitewash. You can spitshine a turd all you want Chogan - but it's still a turd....
