is that gas stations with parking for more than 60 cars? i'm not always in favor of government forced compliance at a serious cost to private businesses
I can see how one can read it that way. But given that no gas station has 60 parking spots, I'm guessing it just means "all gas stations" and also "parking lots that have 60 spots or greater". Gas stations require just a single 50kW DCFC to be in compliance. Parking lots will require at least 4 Level 2 chargers of 6.6kW each. That's pretty bare minimum requirements. Note that it's only within the City of Vancouver and there have a lot of gas station closures in the city in the last 5 years as real estate price increases mean these corner lots are very desirable for condo or commercial/residential mix developments.
that's what i figured. i'm definitely not in favor of forcing indies, and some don't have space for chargers. i also don't buy the need for ocal charging to increase ev sales. that is an excuse from people who won't buy an ev after they are installed. what we need more of is destination chargers, and cheaper ev's.
Vancouver Could Become Canada's 1st City Without A Downtown Gas Station | HuffPost Operative word being “downtown”, still. And in all of Vancouver city, one source says 66 stations are left. Motels would benefit from chargers?
agreed, hotels/motels/highway stations/reststops and the like. they have to be places where people can spend a considerable amount of time, charging isn't like gassing up yet.
True but we have quite a number of older stock apartments that are in no way EV capable (either it's exorbitantly expensive to upgrade the wiring in the building to support it or that hydro has the upgrade the wire in the area to supply that higher power). At least all new development must have 100% of the parking stalls EV-ready both residential and commercial. (i.e. a 240V plug)
Well, all the parking lots need to be compliant are destination chargers. Unless near something of interest, the 50kW ones at a gas station aren't going to do much directly. Cheaper BEVs would be great, but let's be real. The currently available models aren't having trouble selling, and they still have less range than a ICE car. Cheaper models will have less range. Combined with longish charge times, you need a public charger presence to assuage fears of getting stranded. Yes, under 200 miles is plenty for a majority of daily trips, but most of the public can't seem to grasp that. A single 50kW charger at every gas station is a psychological safety net to support the sales shift from early adopters.
For EVs, range is less important than fast DC charger density. Charger density has increased faster than my battery degradation. Bob Wilson
120/240 Delta 3-phase gives you three 240 VAC circuits, each of which can charge a single car. However it is also possible to use three-phase power fed into rectifiers as DC power, which is likely how Telsa is using the power for 250 VDC charging.
I think the loss in revenue outstrips the cost of L2 installation. If anything, that could be an attraction since EV owners would use your parkade instead of a competitor's.
Well, that would assume that drivers actually obey the signs I suppose. Not suggesting that someone should hang up "No parking " signs but I think its within the realm of possibility. And were the city to hit poor economic conditions? nobody will have the cash to put in chargers, but some cheap signs could save a hanging-on low traffic business from ruinous fines. Believe me, I'd rather see more chargers added- I just think the law is open to major loophole abuse.
in boston, there's no competition between parking garages, you take what you can get, and you like it