Forgive me if this topic has been covered before. I did my due diligence and searched these forums for similar threads, but didn't find any. First a little background. I'm a new Prius owner (I bought the car almost exclusively for its high MPG and low emissions) and have been learning a lot over the past month about how to maximize my MPG etc. It turns out that my usual commute (average less than 3 miles each way to/from the bus stop; my employer gives me a free annual bus pass) doesn't really make the most of my new car's low MPG. The car is just barely warmed up to optimum operating temp by the time I shut it off. Most people who report MPGs in the 50s and 60s apparently commute 10 miles or more to/from work, and I haven't seen many discussions at all about public transportation on the threads I have seen here. (Parking in downtown Seattle ranges from $12 to $25, so the free bus pass is really a great benefit.) Meanwhile I am averaging around 42 MPG so far on my new Prius—mainly because of the short trips and frequent cold starts. So my question is this: Could an unintended side effect of the Prius's widespread popularity be that it actually encourages suburban sprawl? One of the main drawbacks to living way out in the 'burbs, at least in my region, is the amount of money (and time) spent burning gas on the freeways to and from work. If at least one of those factors (the monetary cost) is cut in half by driving a Prius, I'm thinking that at least a few people will make the calculation that they can better afford to live even farther out, where land is cheaper and more plentiful... thus contributing to one of the very problems the Prius was designed to respond to. On the other hand, urban dwellers who have made a conscious decision to live close to where they work in order to reduce their carbon footprint, despite higher housing costs and increased traffic congestion, ironically end up paying more per mile traveled than their suburban counterparts—negating one of the very reasons for living closer to downtown. My overall fuel consumption is still probably lower, but only because I drive so little. If I can get 462 miles on a tank of gas and another Prius owner who lives farther out can get 600 miles on the same tankful, what really is the difference? Maybe I am overthinking all of this—but I have been thinking lately that if my family could now move 15 miles farther out from the city without significantly increasing our fuel consumption or commuting costs (I'd still probably take a bus into the city, but I could drive most of the way and then use a park-n-ride lot) we could probably save considerably by having a smaller mortgage payment while enjoying a larger, newer house and a bigger lot. We might even have access to better public schools. With a growing family, I admit those are pretty strong temptations; I don't act on this impulse (yet) because my conscience tells me that contributing to suburban sprawl is a small act of evil, at least from an environmental perspective. Thoughts?
My thought is, regardless of how you feel about "suburban sprawl", that horse out of the barn, for the most part. In much of the country having a Prius simply makes the best of an existing situation.
Urban sprawl's been around far longer than the Prius, and I don't see why it would contribute more or less than other cars. Zoning is as much to blame as anything - residential, industrial, and commercial areas are seemingly placed as far away from each other as possible. The nicest neighbourhoods in my city, and probably many others, are remnants of the streetcar era, when pretty much everything was clustered around the transit stop.
Yup, no doubt. But you could make the argument about any efficiency gain. Raising CAFE provides an encouragement to sprawl as well. As for the cost.. to generalize, everything is more expensive the closer you get to the city. I would think cost is rarely a reason to move closer to an urban center. To me it's more about access. I really couldn't imagine living 30 miles away from the city, where any trip to the city becomes a major event (I grew up 30 miles from a city, so I know first-hand). I don't think you're overthinking anything. Until we change public policy to dis-incentivize sprawl, it's going to continue.
The recent housing debacle certainly has provided some respite from further development. But there are still wetlands to be filled in, forests to be felled, family farms to be converted to subdivisions—at least in my neck of the woods. It's not like the country's population has leveled off, so there will always be a certain amount of pressure for housing. In my state the population has increased by 13% since 2000 and it's projected to increase by another 25% by 2030. By then Washington's population will be double what it was in 1980. So I wouldn't say that suburban sprawl is over (i.e. "horse is out of the barn"), and I think we all should be looking for ways to use less—less fuel, less water, less land, etc.
Even at 42 mpg you are doing better than 95% of the cars on the road. It sounds like you are a PERFECT candidate for a Nissan leaf! 6 miles a day,, falling off a log with an EV.
I have gotten that comment a lot on this forum... but I occasionally go on the long road trip to remote locations and don't want to be limited by range. Would have waited for a plug-in Prius (the ideal car from what I can tell) but the 0% APR, 0 down deal was just too good to pass up. In a perfect world I'd own a Leaf for bebopping around town and a Prius or hybrid Camry for longer trips... or, just get a plug-in Prius at some point in the future...
Not that you've got the money burning a hole in your pocket, but you can convert your new prius into a Plug in Prius. Once the charge from the plug in is exhausted, it reverts to normal Prius operating mode. Just a thought.....
i think you're making daniel's point from another thread: we are driving more because we are getting mileage. i was skeptical, but it seems to be your train of thought.
That's probably not something I'd be comfortable doing myself... about how much does it cost? And does it void the warranty to make that kind of modification?
So you won't get the best MPGs on the forum, but how was the MPGs on your previous car? what percentage of improvement have you seen there - plus, you are contributing less emissions with the Prius, so you are helping to ratchet down pollution. Yes, an EV would be nice. Your bus pass is better. We all have to live in reality, however, and occasionally, maybe mostly, you will need to drive somewhere. Hey, maybe you could ride a bike to the bus station?
I don't believe that Prius significantly encourages sprawl. Fuel has never been the majority of a car's operating cost, or even the largest cost on recent models. Depreciation is larger until the vehicle gets older. Insurance, financing, maintenance, repairs, parking, etc. add up to a lot. Prius cuts the fuel portion in half, and repairs by a smaller fraction, but doesn't help the rest. Another huge cost to sprawl is the time consumed by longer commutes. Prius doesn't help that either. While people living further away pay less per mile of commute, the miles increase much faster than the rate drops. The total price only gets higher with distance. The "horse is out of the barn" comment did not imply that sprawl has ended. It began long before Prius was invented, and would still be continuing even if hybrids and modern EVs were not available. I don't see them as saving enough money or any commute time to be a substantial driver of additional sprawl.
Of course fuel efficient cars promote sprawl. If the best technology could do was 10 mpg, do you think I would have bought a weekend house 75 miles away? At some point, the time with your butt in the seat of a car offsets fuel cost. Criteria for selecting a weekend house, can I commute in on a Monday morning? I'm willing to get up at 4:30am and leave at 5:20am to get to work, but I'm not willing to get up a 3:00am. A five door that can be loaded in a garage was a major requirement. Don't want to be going outside in the rain to load up to go back to the city.
At one time few people ever traveled more than 30 miles from their place of birth. Improved transportation changed this dramatically. All improvements in transportation have influenced living patterns, but as others have pointed out, many other factors are in play. I suspect you are over-thinking the whole thing. Tom
I don't think that the economy of the Prius will create new housing developments on the outskirts of town, but it may make that kind of urban sprawl more affordable. In the end, driving daily from beyond the edge of town and back in a Prius is better that the same commute in a less efficient car.
For a car (any car) not to promote sprawl, it would have to be too painful to travel far in it. (financial pain, physical pain, emotional pain, etc.) The question you need to ask: Do people who own a Prius drive more because it is cheaper, or do people who drive more buy a Prius because it is cheaper?
Bob is also the name of my main computer. All of my computers are named Bob in one form or another. Tom