I have upgraded to nikons D3 and have my barely used D300 for sale. Here is the Ebay link if you are interested. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=300188124209&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT&ih=020
Do you think it's fair to call it 'barely used' for a camera that has "less than 4000 actuations"? Less than 100 or 200 I think is fair to call 'barely used', but 4000 is equivalent to over 100 rolls of film. I'm sure it's in great shape and is probably rated for over 50k actuations, but 'barely used' brings to mind much less than 4000. BTW, would love to have it, but can't justify ditching my 'barely used' D200!