Selected excerpts: The complete article can be read at: The Jerusalem Post National Review National Post (Canada)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Aug 3 2006, 08:10 PM) [snapback]297417[/snapback]</div> Whatever Israel is doing, it sure is taking the bad publicity off of the Iraq/Civil War situation. I think they're tag teaming the media. Suckers!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mirza @ Aug 3 2006, 06:34 PM) [snapback]297432[/snapback]</div> Is this another one of your heroes? Perhaps you should read some more about him.
OK, it will turn many of your stomachs . . . Fox News, Bill O'Reilly . . . etc, etc . . . but you really should see the August 2nd interview he did with Dan Rather – especially the part about “some (American) networks give moral equivalence to Hezbollah in the reporting of this war.” Dan Rather's comments shocked me. I mean jaw on the floor shocked! http://www.foxnews.com/oreilly/ The only reason I even bother posting this is because it is so very apropos to IsrAmeriPrius' thread, and many of you "open minded" people would have missed it otherwise. Buck up and be well informed. After all, it is Dan Rather we are talking about. You can do your Faux News dry heaves later.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mirza @ Aug 3 2006, 09:34 PM) [snapback]297432[/snapback]</div> Do you have that next to your copy of the The Protocol of Elders in Zion?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mirza @ Aug 4 2006, 09:37 AM) [snapback]297616[/snapback]</div> A window opens into the thoughts of darkness
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Aug 4 2006, 10:15 AM) [snapback]297630[/snapback]</div> I've been waiting for this... http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs8138 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/...1220505,00.html
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mirza @ Aug 4 2006, 07:18 AM) [snapback]297633[/snapback]</div> Here are some selected excerpts from that article:
There is SOME truth to this you know... Of course, he won't fall on his sword for Israel, he must thus be an anti-semitic scumbag... It's pretty well known our support of Israel, essentially, rubs the Arabs the wrong way... <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Aug 4 2006, 10:15 AM) [snapback]297630[/snapback]</div> Oh yeah, the IDF can do no wrong.... :lol:
It only gets better: This guy uses the photos taken at the same time (some taken by other photographers) to claim they represent damage inflicted as much as two weeks apart. Men's News Daily - Reuters And The Cloned Blown Smoke Power Line - Reuters calls the doctor, take 2
These don't look staged to me... they are not deceiving. There isn't anything about the photos of your last post that would indicate anything false... take the woman... the building's window setups look very similar to me... that or she's been walking around in utter shock to losing her life's possessions... and her photo taken twice by the same photographer, or by two separate photographers in the area.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Aug 7 2006, 01:17 PM) [snapback]299114[/snapback]</div> Are you aware of al-Reuters mea culpa today?? They admitted to aiding and abetting Hezbollah and the terrorists - and this from a company founded by the son of a Rabbi :huh:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Aug 7 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]299126[/snapback]</div> I posted a link to Reuters mea culpa, yesterday, in post #13 in this thread.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mirza @ Aug 6 2006, 10:11 PM) [snapback]298883[/snapback]</div> Excuses, excuses... Actually, lies and exaggerations. The two photos with the same woman, supposedly taken by two different photojournalists and distributed to the world's media, show the same building in Beirut in ruins. One of the photos says it is evidence of an attack on July 24th, and the other photo says it is evidence of an Israeli attack on August 5th. Which one is it? It should have been easy for any news agency editor to detect the transparent rerun of the photo. There is a rather unique building located right next to the wreckage. It is clearly visible in both photos. Since the alleged indiscriminate and widespread bombing of Beirut is the main propaganda theme of Hizbollah, the repetitive use of the same photo as evidence of multiple attacks makes Reuters a complicit pardner of the terror group's disinformation campaign. In the other sets of photographs, the same rescue worker is posing for the cameramen at different rescue locations in different towns and villages on separate days. Can you say "staged media events"? Just how gullible can you be? Google News Search