Water heating options...anyone tried condensing water heater?

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by Celtic Blue, May 25, 2009.

  1. Celtic Blue

    Celtic Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    2,224
    139
    0
    Location:
    Midwest
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    As some of you are aware, I've been thinking some about long term approaches to reducing my nat. gas load from water heating. I've done some of the easy stuff: insulated as many hot water runs as I can reach, blanketed the tank, and gone to a front loading washer (already had the Energy Star dishwasher.) I've ordered one low flow shower head for testing. If it works satisfactorily others will follow. This carries great promise for minimizing hot water use.

    However, once these things are done, end use conservation and such will be at roads end. So this brings me to considering the water heating itself. Working through it I come to the conclusion that a condensing nat. gas water heater (w/tank) would be the most cost effective. Do any of you have one of these?

    I'm in a true 4-season climate and have four hot water users. Therefore I anticipate that solar water heating would be limited to replacing about 50% of the load on an annualized basis. (Perhaps 60% or more would be possible, but I'm trying to remain conservative.)

    Before, I had also considered a demand based pairing, but my rough calcs suggest the energy savings for that wouldn't be as large as I hoped, while the capital cost would be. The energy factor for an electric water tank runs about 0.92, which indicates only about an 8% loss due to the storage tank. Interestingly, the energy factor for most of the listed tankless water heaters is only 0.82, although a few are listed all the way up to 0.98.

    So that leads to the next consideration: why not electric water heating? Energy Star gas water heaters are in the 0.62 efficiency range and my non-Energy Star tank is listed as 0.58--before I jacketed it, which should bump it up well into the Energy Star range. Unfortunately, the efficiency of the electrical generation is low, about 33-60% max depending on source (the higher value being combined cycle with steam.) Plus transmission losses average another 7% in the U.S. So relying on gas even with the low water heater efficiency value still clobbers electricity even in the best case (0.92*0.6*0.93 = 51% and more in the most likely older coal plant case 0.92*0.33*0.93 = 28%.)

    Other arrangements such as heat pump water heating and the like are not well suited for this climate.

    Okay, then while solar would be great, it is not stand alone in this climate and natural gas looks like the most efficient/cost effective option here for the time being. But why not get the most efficient gas burner possible, a condensing system? It's going to be pricey, but still cheaper than tankless. The current problem is that they don't seem to have much market penetration yet and are not even Energy Star rated. The Energy Star ratings for these are supposed to come out this year...and the minimum will be 80%, I read somewhere that some will hit 89% overall efficiency. So when it comes time to replace this water heater that is the route I hope to follow...but I hope the existing tank will last long enough to work out the kinks and novelty (to installers) of the condensing units.
     
  2. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Shawn,

    I know nothing about condensing burners for water heaters.

    As I'm sure you and I have written about before,,, I am a huge fan of Pre-heated solar,,, supplemented with demand. The newest generation of Tagaki/Rinnai/Paloma demand water heaters are great products. Yes the up front cost is significant,, but with tax credits they come in line pretty quickly. Venting issues are expensive if you have a long run of vent,, but they can be direct vented out a side wall if you have a place to do so.

    My simple solar pre-heat system supplies ~70% of our hot water (for 2) on a year round basis. After about April 1 it does 100%. The takagi handles this perfectly,,, not caring what the inlet temp is.

    There are other issues,, for example distance to fixture,, but these units are so small (even for a big out put) the idea of using more than one as a point of use is pretty attractive,, in lieu of a circ system,, at similar cost.

    Icarus

    PS My system is in far NW Washington state.

    Icarus
     
  3. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,532
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    Keep on posting Shawn. These topics are great!
    Would you mind providing details why you think solar heat will only cover 50-70% of your use ? I think of that question as a cost/benefit, not a technical limitation. I am pricing out a system in the next few days, so know that increasing heating capacity is really only an extra collector cost; the plumbing, controller and pumps are a fixed cost.

    Now, you may have to cover extra collector panels in the summer to prevent overheating, but I doubt that is a big deal to you given your obvious motivation to cut carbon emissions.
     
  4. Shin Chan

    Shin Chan Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    56
    6
    0
    Location:
    Sacrameto, California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    [ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_heat_pump]Geothermal heat pump - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    If you had the room to do so, why not think about a slinky-coil geothermal system too.
     
  5. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Here in Manitoba, we have the cheapest power rates in Canada, among the cheapest power rates in North America. Cost-wise, an electric hot water tank is a good bet. Brand new homes are built with electric furnaces, if that's any indication of how our power rates compare to natural gas

    I like natural gas water heaters strictly for their recovery rate. I really hate running out of hot water in the middle of a soak, and have never had that happen with a gas hot water tank.

    In my home, I have a gas furnace, gas hot water tank, gas fireplace, gas heater in the attached garage. The stove and dryer are electric. FYI my gas bill just for heating hot water is $45 a month

    I've never heard of condensing hot water heaters. They seem like a good bet. I've never seen them around here
     
  6. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    It seems that the going rate for a condensing water heater is ~$2700 usd. A Takagi/Rinnai runs ~$800

    The condensing unit runs ~95% ef,, the demand ~85%.

    What I don't know is how much you can/should calculate in for standby loses. With a demand tankless standby is zero,, but there has to be some standby loss with a tank type. Lets just say it is 5% for the sake of argument. In that case $1900 for 5% advantage would be a pretty difficult pay off. Factor in longevity and I'm not sure it would ever pay off. (Understanding that not everything is about the payoff time!) A conventional tank with life expectancy of 10-15 years, a full stainless demand might last 15-30? I am still running a number of Palomas that are more than 20 years old.

    For that $$ difference you could put 3 demand water heaters as needed at point of use heaters.
     
  7. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,076
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Keep in mind that depending on where your water heater is located, tank losses are not really losses during heating season.

    Tom
     
  8. hyo silver

    hyo silver Awaaaaay

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    15,260
    1,598
    0
    Location:
    off into the sunset
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Good point, Tom.

    And if those incandescent light bulbs are only 5% efficient at producing light, doesn't that make them 95% efficient at producing heat? :)
     
  9. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Good point,,, but on an annualized basis,, they are still loses. Also perhaps not the most efficient way of heating space.

    As for Hyo's point,, heating your house with light bulbs is not much worse than heating with resistance heating!

    Icarus
     
  10. Celtic Blue

    Celtic Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    2,224
    139
    0
    Location:
    Midwest
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Brand new A.O. Smith's condensing (which are considered premium) can be had for about $1600. The Energy Star estimator I came across suggested a price under $1000, but I assume that is once initial low volume premium's disappear. I'm not familiar with the Takagi/Rinnai. I was a bit shocked/turned off by the prices I've seen on various demand water heaters and the reviews they have gotten.

    Standby losses probably are not more than 8% since electric water heaters have about 92% efficiency. The A.O. Smith also has extra nozzles that can be used with recirc...or perhaps thermal solar. I like the design of the A.O. Smith with the simple helical coil. We'll get a better idea on relative efficiencies when the first set of condensing water heater energy factors are published.

    Older gas water heaters suffered more from air flow up the flue (uninsulated internal wall getting a draft) and from little insulation on top and bottom of the tank as well as from the thermosiphon in the inlet/outlet lines which typically could not be insulated. (You have to go out and find some noncombustible type material to do this--which is not carried in many of the big box builder stores anymore.) Some traps can be installed to reduce the effect as well. Since they were non-condensing as well, the efficiencies for standard dimensions have been been about 58-62%.

    Demand or tank I hope to go to sealed combustion/direct vent as part of my drive to tighten up the home. So I put the costs of this aspect of the install as about equivalent.
     
  11. hyo silver

    hyo silver Awaaaaay

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    15,260
    1,598
    0
    Location:
    off into the sunset
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I've heard that rabbits put out prodigious amounts of body heat, which can be particularly efficient if they're eating waste materials anyway. No idea how many it would take for a decent sized bunny-furnace, but you'd likely have too many well before next winter. :p
     
  12. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    not if you eat some along the way. :p
     
  13. Celtic Blue

    Celtic Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    2,224
    139
    0
    Location:
    Midwest
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Makes sense because of the hydro. But I'm pretty sure that your areas' builds are also tighter and better insulated than ours...

    That's about what we have. $25/month for fixed charge, then the going rate for about 18 ccF of gas, plus taxes/franchise fees.
     
  14. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    You pretty much have to use 2x6 walls, but roof still only requires R-40. Almost everybody blows in R-50 or more, it's dumb not to when its so easy to do during contruction

    No requirement for tri-panes, but most builders either use them or strongly encourage them. I have tri-panes with dual Argon fill and dual Low E. Compared to a dual pane, huge difference in comfort and performance

    :eek:

    For electricity, fixed charge is $6.85 a month. First 900 kwh are 6.25 cents a kwh, balance is 6.30 cents a kwh

    For natural gas, the fixed charge has now shot up to $13 a month. They have different tiers of consumption, in addition they calculate primary, supplemental, transportation, and distribution charges separately. Also despite the fact the meter reads cubic feet, the calculation is based on cubic metres.

    If I did the conversion correctly, I think it works out to around $14 a decatherm. Still reasonable compared to other areas
     
  15. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Yeah I just *bet* you "heard" that .... ;)
     
  16. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Screeching back to the OT, Manitoba Hydro is strongly encouraging new construction to use geothermal exchange heat pumps, with desuperheaters to assist hot water in winter, and primarily do hot water in summer
     
  17. Celtic Blue

    Celtic Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    2,224
    139
    0
    Location:
    Midwest
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Those are pretty substantial increased from what I see around here. 2x4 walls were the 90's norm (not sure what they put in new now.) Sloppy/slipshod insulating/sealing was the norm. 2x10 cathedral spacing is good for about R-30. Of course some of the other 2x6 flat attic areas only had R-11(????) or R-19 before I replaced/layered them. Also have some nice blown in to about R-30+ in sections existing, but need more to really complete the job in other sections.

    I've been sealing, sealing, sealing. Yesterday I realized the bathroom vents were FUBAR while making my first Spring trip into the attic. Not only were they not sealed (now fixed) but two of three vent into the blown insulation (completely covered...couldn't find them without turning them on and digging). The butterfly damper was obstructed by insulation on one, and couldn't open. :eek: When I cleared around it my wife said, "Hey, was that you? The pitch changed." The other vents between floors...to nowhere and turned the wrong way. :rolleyes:

    So now I need to rig up a snorkel for the upper two, while trying to decide if I wan't to vent them to the roof. Despite their poor arrangement, they haven't produced any moisture damage to drywall or insulation so I have cheap options that appear appealing...

    I can see where tripanes make sense up there. I would probably go that route here with a new installation.

    Ours has petitioned to go from $25/month to $30/month. I'm sure they will get it as I've never seen a utility fee petition fail.

    U.S. conservatives like to go on about how govt. can't do anything right, and the free market is the answer, blah, blah, blah. But I'll tell you this, the best/least expensive utility service I've experienced came from one where the city managed gas, electric, water, garbage, and sewer. Those multiple $25/month fees were replaced by a single fee...pretty much kicking the "free market's" nice person without even trying and in a single bill. Did I mention their incremental rates were also quite low? Contrast this with Houston area which was the worst: separate everything, nickel and dime you to death with a dozen separate bills and fixed charges. Houston was also the slowest and least responsive. You want to get hooked up? They'll be there in a month...Wth??? And the worst f****** postal service in the nation can be found in Houston, to a truly criminal degree compared to the rest of the country. Texans can be real assclowns when it comes to managing a subscription service business, they don't seem to comprehend how you make money off of getting the customer hooked up ASAP. (Spend the same amount on install, just do it sooner so that you start getting revenue sooner, pure profit for minimal effort, duh!)
     
  18. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Air leakage accounts for the majority of heat migration through a building envelope

    At one time, vapor barrier sheets were just overlapped and left like that. It was assumed air wouldn't migrate between the overlap, which was a huge error.

    Now, minimum code up here requires Tuck Tape on all the seams, with acoustic sealant at the bottom plate. The rim board/joist needs a foam isolation pad as a thermal break.

    One side effect of making new homes air tight is that indoor air quality has gone downhill. Depending on jurisdiction, a central exhaust system is now put in, and most builders will automatically do it anyway.

    With the ducting already hooked up for central exhaust, going the extra step to a heat recovery ventilator is a no brainer. I run my HRV on low 24x7. I also do this to minimise radon exposure

    Another side effect to air tight homes is radon exposure. It's not code yet, but some builders are venting the sump pump pit out the attic, same as for a sewer vent.

    Here is how I would do a home, conventional stick frame 2x6 walls with a basement: use insulated concrete forms for the basement walls. You automatically have a thermal break, and an R40 wall, when done

    For the exterior walls, use that BASF Walltite blown polyurethane insulation. You can achieve R values 40% higher than batt. Eg, a 2x6 batt insulated wall would normally be around R19, you can increase that to R26 with Walltite

    Of course, all ceiling fixtures and exterior wall receptacles in airtight boxes, which are tuck taped to the vapor barrier

    I think you're better off going out the side of the gable. Making sure you use duct insulation, with a slight downward pitch to the exterior hood. The downward pitch is to allow condensation to run out and away from the attic

    In a climate like yours, venting out the roof can allow condensation to form in the vertical pipe. That condensation not only can freeze near the top, it will run back down into the fan

    At least none that you can see at this point ....

    Of course, they also operated as "not for profit" so only had to meet costs, not pay off shareholders and executives. Back in the late 1980's I briefly lived in a small town while doing a project. The town owned their own phone co, power co, etc

    Phone service was $5 a month, plus long distance! Power was so reasonable, hardly anybody used natural gas. When I moved into the place, I went to the town hall to sign up for services. Then went for groceries, and when I got back half an hour later, the guy was patiently waiting for me to show up

    Not many examples like that anymore. Locally, Manitoba Hydro appears to have jumped off a cliff. A new power dam up north will cost over 10 billion, but like a lot of Canadians, will then give away the power to the US at fire sale prices

    They're also building the new office tower, with an estimated completion cost of $300 million. Oh, its LEEDs certified, whoop de doo.

    Not sure why they needed a new office tower, the old building was fine. Does every lineman in Manitoba need an office suite now???

    So mismanagement and abuse also happen in public sector enterprises too
     
  19. Celtic Blue

    Celtic Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    2,224
    139
    0
    Location:
    Midwest
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    There are some other recommendations I've seen for making sure that a passive radon vent is centrally placed. The very act of putting in a passive vent, and proper site prep should minimize the radon concerns as it will tend to vent out this way. Plus, already having a passive vent makes it easy to install a vacuum blower if needed.

    This home is not going to be airtight unless I take off all the siding and redo it myself. I'm just addressing the major air leaks that I find. If it was airtight then I would have backdraft issues with the water heater and furnace drawing in the closed utility space. They are pulling their air from the floor joists/rimjoists.

    No, there is none. I've looked at it from above on both, right where they expel hot humid air into the attic in the insulation. Amazingly there wasn't any sign that the board had even gotten the least bit moist, although there was plenty of dust at the exhaust in the insulation.

    Now in the downstairs bath there is water damage in the ceiling...but that's because the wax seal on the toilet above just failed. So I get to play plumber tonight. :unsure:
     
  20. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    In that case, make sure you put up that fanfold foamboard, then housewrap that is Tuck Taped at all the seams. Will make a big difference, especially on windy cold winter days

    It's code here to have a 6 inch insulated duct from outside, to feed the utility room. An electric hot water tank needs no ventilation, and a condensing direct vent natural gas furnace is also ok with no vent.

    A danger in making a house airtight without considering combustion air needs, is a tragedy in the making.


    Good, you got off lucky. I've seen older houses where they vented the bathroom van into the attic, most of the rafters and roof plywood was rotten

    I know you don't want to hear it, but I can't help myself:

    S*** happens