Separate names with a comma.
You haven't done that. All you have done is the denialist trick of saying: "X is true because of this blogpost that I am linking here". My...
Exactly! A line truncated after we have the instrumental record making recent proxy measurements less valuable. And here it is. A Nature paper...
Yes. What the graphs show is only the most recent Briffa data not plotted. That's all. What do you see? [IMG]
Ok. Show me how they did this. Don't go and copy a whole blogpost and say "here". In your own words, what is your understanding of what...
Wrong how? Not only not showing the recent Briffa data is unimportant it probably would have been incorrect to show. As that paper demonstrates.
Going back to science. Instead of looking into peoples motivations to present data the way the did I asked myself "could there be a scientific...
All I see is when you read those emails is a group of scientists trying to explain one divergent series from the other series that do concur with...
Actually no. Besides Fox News and the denialist blogosphere 'cooler' heads are arriving at the same conclusions: Sifting Through...
This is the drop in the bucket I care about. Being defeatist is not the strategy here. We are causing the change and we can stop it.
Yeah..that's data..
And this one is just plain awesome: [IMG]
Now that's an interesting point. That is an example of an abrupt change in change that is just as, if not faster than the current warming. I did...
Show it. In an editorial there is no reference to data. If his points are the conclusion of a paper based on data I'd be the first one to be...
Look at the x-axis in that graph. The spikes are about 25k years.
There were no humans or civilization a million years ago. Do you really want to test if civilization could survive in paleoclimate? Or even the...
What is the trend line trickery again? I would have to see how that graph was used but it is not equivalent to attempt to disprove or disregard...
BTW, you can't write that and then cite a newspaper... What is it I should answer, for NTH time!
Exactly.
You mean besides the whole field of climatology? The data is publicly available and can be examined by anyone. Where do you think those...
Whatever it is, it is not unexpected from the data and it is not an argument to say "there is no warming because there is cooling".
