Separate names with a comma.
Well...that's your problem isn't it.
Awesome clip! [media]
He can speak all he wants. It's only what he publishes what counts. You are just verifying my point.
And therein lies his hypocrisy. His publications do not in any way contradict the fact that there is global warming or that it is anthropogenic....
...or publish anything that backs up his opinions.
Not true. Funding is for the data and its interpretation. A scientist does not just collect data but uses his expertise to create a theory and a...
I'd prefer that to the alternative.
Maybe, just maybe they are climatologists sharing their expertise and have an article answering pseudoskeptical points?
You can't compare those two graphs. The time scale of the upper graph fits on the width of the tip of your cursor on the lower graph. When you...
As if on cue: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h9XntsSEro&eurl
Yeah but you don't know anything about them. You don't know if they were used in Mann's paper or even if they are appropriate. Do you even...
I don't know where you got that or if they are actually on Mann's paper, or how relevant they are to the discussion. But a lot of them do go up...
You base (copy) your argument based only on tree data. Mann's recent paper includes 16 different proxies including but not limited to: 1)...
Yeah. Criticize the word "could" and object to the 1000 years timeline out of personal incredulity. Keep the lucid arguments coming....:rolleyes:
Says who? Looks to me they all support the observation that it's warmer now than in the past 2000 years. [IMG]
