Separate names with a comma.
It really is that simple. For those interested in fact-based ideas: A Climate Change Reading List For Laypeople : NPR A Climate Change...
The problem is the dilution of actual information with the misinformation of whatsupwiththat and climateaudit and other denialist blogs. People...
Well, if you want to try to publish that you proved AGW is not happening using a discussion with some guy in an internet forum be my guest.
I am just going to paste these from the myriad times you've been answered:...
Looks warmer than the 1880s to me...
I don't think deniers keep their datasets straight...
So gracious of you to accept the data. Looks to me that CO2 concentrations match very well the temperature. Even those dips before the 50's....
When did that happen?
I just like to collect graphs that independently verify warming. No trees, no CRU: [IMG] Since 1980, global surface temperatures have increased...
The northern hemisphere is slightly larger than the US...
Not Science yet, but Nature has published their opinion on the emails: "Nothing in the e-mails undermines the scientific case that global warming...
That's US temperature.
Where are the 40-50 years of cooling? I responded to him and Timbikes many times and they would just keep asking for me to answer....
Yes. I can see how graphs and data can be insulting to you.
And that's exactly what we have. The graph you constantly show starts on 1979. You have to compare pre-70s temperatures to current. [IMG]
No! Only one graph and portions of another would be affected if you take out all the data from CRUT. The others are independent verification of...
It is not in the graphs I posted. Not present. Not related. Not there! What is wrong with you people?
Tim: you seriously have a problem.
You don't get that data is not present in those graphs I presented. It is a set of data with problems as knowledged buy the authors at...
