Separate names with a comma.
I'm OK with that. See the Copenhagen Consensus for projects to help the world.
Richard - Arctic sea ice has recovered quite nicely, to around average, but you don't hear about that in the news, do you? Nor do you hear that...
Scott - I linked to the RealClimate article, so I'm not feeling too badly that I'm not qualified to comment on the means of calculations - but it...
Glad we are in agreement. Honestly, there are plenty of folks on both sides of the argument that mis-represent. I try not to - but have on...
Hmm. What do you call global warming "believers" who do the same? Frauds too? Here is a prime example of the sort of distortions promulgated by...
Excellent posting! I agree 110%! Really great.
Scott et al - I am happy to go on debating but it seems it is getting rather silly. Certainly it is taking up a lot of our time. My argument as...
Well we will have to see how the Schwartz paper holds up, though Hansen also finds a climate sensitivity value quite close to Schwartz and this...
Wow Scott you have been busy and I always do appreciate your comments. I will attempt to address them as best I can and have added numbering to...
Here ya go..
OK - so you don't think I'm ignoring you I will also go back to this posting. I think the IPCC's claimed "certainties" frankly are quite...
OK - getting time here to check back. So, I hear what you are saying KMO about the climate equilibrium and the additional increase in temperature...
Sorry KMO - I certainly did not intend to slight you. I am responding quickly as I have time. I will re-read your comments as I have a chance an...
F8L - I *think* we are talking about a different linear relationship here. My point is that at increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2,...
I understand - but I guess it depends on what you characterize as benefits and costs. The cost of oil is at an all time high and I suspect ANWR...
You are correct, of course Scott. I calculated the total on the basis on % increase in CO2, not increase in ppm. Apologies. Regardless, I think...
My point was not anti-hybrid. My point is that just because something is a "fart in a windstorm" is not sufficient justification to not pursue...
Do the math.
Yes - it will be interesting - interesting to see how the politicians will distance themselves from the chicken littles crying global warming...
I agree we should wean ourselves, but that ain't gonna happen overnight. Hybrids are a fart in a windstorm too. I don't see a problem with ANWR...
