Separate names with a comma.
Trunk volume and height is made much bigger, so trolls with long horns will fit in.
PriusChat's 2016 Toyota Prius First Drive Video Review | PriusChat
I think it will appeal to much wider audience than Gen 3. In this respect - it is worth it - to Toyota.
@fuzzy1 I think spwolf in this thread gives an answer to the riddle (at least partial) quoting from edmonds.com review of Gen 4: "Official EPA...
This is not what I am saying or hoping. JC08 and NEDC themselves are not in line...Read my post just above yours. 53-54 MPG combined looks to me...
Teenagers - to the front! Wide hips in the rear please.
If you drive harder...you drive harder with Gen 3 too isn't it? Having said that, 10%-18% improvement span among tests may be reasonable, however,...
Different battery chemistry and weight though.
Same here.
Every argument you bring (here and in previous posts) is true IMO to both Gen 3 and Gen 4 so cannot explain the huge difference in relative...
@Jeff N Can you elaborate on this statement from your colleague?
Correct.
It is a surprise to me. Unlike Gen 3 (non Eco), Aqua achieved artificially high score on JC08 due to their 'weight classes' system. If you compare...
True for both cars...
Why higher average speed, harsher environment, non warmed-up etc. make relative improvements more difficult? Not making sense. Are you are...
I fully understand the 'gaming' that is why I am talking of improvements and not absolute numbers.
It is ~8% (56/52). On JC08 it is also 8% (40 km/l vs. 37). What really seems weird to me is the low non Eco estimates on EPA! only 4% improvement...
Improvements on fuel economy tests: Japan JC08 non Eco models: 22% improvement from Gen 3 (37 km/l vs. 30.4), weight is similar (within 10 kg)....
Visual Tables of Gen4 Package Combinations | PriusChat
Model 2 ECO - Li-Ion battery, no spare, 27.3 ft3. All models accept for Model 2 (non ECO) - Li-Ion. Models with spare - 24.6 ft3, models without...
