Are you guys condemming the lifestyle of someone who loves their livestock? My livestock are clearly dependant on me for their livelyhood and provision... What would be wrong with me marrying them and "takeing advantage of the same tax breaks afforded to heterosexual marriages"? 14 or 15 is not an unreasonable number of dependants.. I should ask my accountant, maybe I need to get a dog or two and marry them to save a few more bucks. You guys should probably be more tolerant and just accept this lifestyle. Who are you to say it's wrong? I was born this way, it's not a choice.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Nov 14 2006, 06:49 PM) [snapback]349143[/snapback]</div> Ummmmm, so you're equating homosexuals with livestock...? I'd say, fcuk off, but that would be rude. As a heterosexual, do you have sex with only female animals? And are they of consenting age? Do you still respect them in the morning...and, do they, you...? Wait, you probably claim to be a Christian, so you can't have premarital sex.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Nov 14 2006, 06:49 PM) [snapback]349143[/snapback]</div> Why, since you put it that way, you're absolutely right. We SHOULD stay with traditional marriages. Of course, traditionally, people weren't allowed to marry people of different races, so we better make a lot more room in our jails. Also, monogamy is a relatively new invention. Exactly how many wives do you have? And if less than three, what are you, some kind of radical hippie or something? And since in traditional marriages, the wife is simply property of the husband, I assume you've arranged with a brother to marry your wife when you die (and vice-versa), like the Bible states? Ah, tradition!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stev0 @ Nov 14 2006, 08:58 PM) [snapback]349242[/snapback]</div> And don't forget another tradition...the one where, on the morning after the wedding, the mother in law checks the sheets to make sure the bride was a virgin.