<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(banjoman @ Oct 30 2007, 12:23 PM) [snapback]532548[/snapback]</div> There is so much more to sea level changes than just proclaiming a simple number. I'm finding it even more complex than I orginally thought so I'll post some of my findings here for you to go over. Sorry I cannot make it a simple number. I doubt the link will work but I'll try HERE Reference: J M Gregory, J A Lowe, S F B Tett. "Simulated Global-Mean Sea Level Changes over the Last Half-Millennium. " Journal of Climate 19.18 (2006): 4576-4591
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sliderule @ Oct 30 2007, 08:03 PM) [snapback]532724[/snapback]</div> I would love to be grateful that you posted a link that seemed like it contained scientific information but upon reading it and further investigation I see you linked me to a bi-weekly report put on by the front group "The Greening Earth Society"... a front group for The Western Fuels Association? I really do appreciate the effort and I assume you didn't realize their source. I understand that this does not automatically exclude them from having legit information but it does cast a HUGE shadow of doubt. Links: The Greening Earth Society — funded and controlled by the Western Fuels Association, an association of coal-burning utility companies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greening_Earth_Society The Greening Earth Society VS. the State of the World - by Ian Smith, in collaboration with NOAA Scientist Pieter Tans Greening Earth Society/Western Fuels Association
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(F8L @ Oct 30 2007, 10:35 PM) [snapback]532734[/snapback]</div> You know the old saying...."You can lead a horse to water, but you can't .........."
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sliderule @ Oct 31 2007, 07:16 AM) [snapback]532883[/snapback]</div> So you are saying I should put 100% faith in organization? Wow! :lol:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Sep 22 2007, 07:07 PM) [snapback]516338[/snapback]</div> Symptoms yes, but it's even more. Ocean temps near the equator approach 100 degrees, and carry surface oxygen towards the poles ... where the polar ice temps drag the oxygen down towards the bottom where the oxigenated waters head back towards the equator. Once that cycle diminishes, kiss your arse good bye (no big deal, it probably won't happen 'till your grandkids are adults ). Ever smelled the de-oxygenated mud in a swamp? That offgassng is a result of bacteria that thrive in deoxygenated environments. Akin to sulpher ... and in higher & higher amounts it becomes so toxic it will be fatal. Welcome to the future. Heck, the corporate oilies better hire more scientists to say it's not so.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sliderule @ Oct 30 2007, 10:03 PM) [snapback]532724[/snapback]</div> Frankly, a web article from 2005 on the site edited by Patrick Michaels, who regularly gets his money from the oil industry, is hardly much of a source. World Climate Report is published by the Greening Earth Society, basically a front-group funded by the Western Fuels Association http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title...g_Earth_Society http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title...ick_J._Michaels http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=4 A better discussion of Antarctic ice can be found at http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archi...ctica-snowfall/