March 2009 data is now posted. Is anyone using my data for anything? Just wondering. I think I will quit logging data from my CAN-View at the end of July unless someone wants me to continue.
he did you also look at your packV screen now while driving? did you notice anything or did iit seem al normal.
I have watched the packV screen while driving but I really don't know what I'm looking for. The voltages all stay about the same voltage as each other. I asked Norm if he could output the voltages through the RAW serial output and he said something along the lines that he would think about it. It would be nice if he would do that so we could have that information in case we wanted to do something with it.
I'll watch for that. Norm told me that since the packets are not updated as quick as real time the voltage difference may not be accurate. Or something along the lines of that.
yhea its better to have the car standing still and just see if there is any info high or low thats stays that way for longer time´s in that case you may have a problem.
Well I too get all red when braking but the voltages go above 18v. I'm assuming thats a good charge voltage for the cells. By default this voltage would be a warning from the CAN-View. While driving the voltages did not do much but that may be because the Hymotion was topping them off and keeping things even. I'll do another test when I get home by running off the stock battery only to see what happens.
Sorry I forgot to update. I did a test without the Hymotion and I got pretty much the same results. I got high voltage when braking and some lower voltages when hard accelerating. Really nothing to worry about. If I had a way of recording the numbers I would post them here. Maybe one day I can get my video camera out and record the results.
i hope norm will put it on the data output. you can collect date over a longer periode to see if there is any change in the cell voltages and so detect a problem.
Thats what I asked him to do when I seen that he added this pack voltage info. He said something along the lines that he would think about it.
lets wait and see it would be great if the temp hack can be swichted on and off by canview based on some canbus info..
I don't see how the temp hack would work with the can-view unless you can spoof the CAN packets instead of using the actual hack. That way the can-view knows the actual temperature all the time but will give the car the fake value. If you use the can-view to turn on the physical hack the can-view would have no way of telling what the actual temperature is. What would be nice is if the can-view could fake the temperature over the CAN bus and do everything on its own including clearing any errors that may occur while using the temperature hack.
mmmm? if you use the temp hack manual by w switch like you did the canview can also not tell the real temp because as you can see the canview is also faked.. and presents the temp reading you just made with the resistor so i dont see the problem with a canview relay switching based on IF the ICE is running or nog ICE ofF temp hack relay ON iCE ON temp hack relay OFF.
If you did it that way you would still have to adjust a POT unless you just bypass the coolant resistor. You would also want the hack to be on when the engine is on if your actual temp is below 150F and you speed is greater than 41MPH. This way you can do warp stealth or get 150+ MPG.